Reading time 2 min
A recent article by Jamillah Knowles of The Next Web emphasized just how integral page load speed is to the customer experience, and consequently, to a business’s bottom line. To be exact, the article references research by QuBit  revealing that globally, sluggish sites cost online retailers more than £1.7 billion (2.6 billion US dollars) in lost sales. The data is dramatic, yet retailers continue to forgo sales due to a performance downfall that they have the power to control.
There’s no denying the impatience of the speed-accustomed online shopper demographic, yet a concern for swift page load time appears to rank low (if ranked at all) on e-retailers’ list of priorities when it comes to managing the customer experience. Well-versed online retailers understand the significance of page design and content, payment options, satisfactory shipping, and other common-knowledge determinants of customer satisfaction, but many are still ignoring the issue of latency. Here are a few key points from the article that should get e-retailers thinking about what they’re doing to proactively monitor site speed and the end-user experience:
    • In 2006, users were satisfied with 4 second load times. By 2009, 2 seconds became the acceptable standard.
    • Google deems any site that takes over 1.5 seconds to load to be ‘slow;’ According to Google, response times over 1.5 seconds justify a search engine ranking demotion.
    • Players as prominent as TicketMaster and Barnes & Noble are making customers wait too long
    • Faster pages result in increased traffic and site stickiness
    • Customers are more likely to take desirable actions related to marketing efforts if offers are delivered quickly and error-free

So, which retailer would you prefer to be – Retailer A who disregards page load time, turns customers away, gets knocked by Google, and contributes to the 2.6 billion dollar loss in e-retail sales? Or site speed savvy Retailer B who monitors application performance, fosters customer loyalty and retention, and takes full advantage of the proliferating E-commerce market? And from the customer experience perspective, are you willing to wait in Retailer A’s long virtual lines when Retailer B offers a shopping experience free of delays?

Looks like slow and steady isn’t winning the race this time.

[Image: Flickr user Dan Eriksson]

Suggested Blog Posts

The Perception Gap for Poor Web Performance

E-commerce revenue continues to grow,as consumers turn away from shopping in brick-and-mortar stores to shopping online.  However, many businesses are not prepared for this growth because they do not fully understand the market and how to invest in...

Read More

Using Browser Trends to Maintain a Better Site

Because of the multifarious nature of web clients today, it’s important to consider the usage statistics when designing, implementing, and managing your site. However, misconceptions often arise when determining what browsers to design...

Read More

Finding Causes of Intermittent Errors from Google Webmaster Tools

Google Webmaster Tools is a web service that allows webmasters to view the status of their sites as seen by Google and the Googlebot crawlers. In addition to indexing your site structure and content, the Googlebot crawlers also record data on perform...

Read More

Optimization Options not Always Optimal

Web designers and developers are always looking for ways to speed up their page load times. Yahoo has an excellent article written on the best practices for speeding up your page. How do you know if implementing one of their suggested practices will...

Read More